Gender Characteristics of the Modesty Maxim in English and Uzbek Languages and A Sociolinguistic Analysis
PDF
DOI

Keywords

Modesty Maxim, Gender Characteristics, Sociolinguistics, Politeness Theory, English Language, Uzbek Language

How to Cite

Gender Characteristics of the Modesty Maxim in English and Uzbek Languages and A Sociolinguistic Analysis. (2024). MEDICINE, PEDAGOGY AND TECHNOLOGY: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2(11), 108-110. https://universalpublishings.com/~niverta1/index.php/mpttp/article/view/8124

Abstract

This article explores the importance of the maxim, in politeness theory by examining gender differences in English and Uzbek languages usage patterns. We delve into how both men and women employ the maxim to shed light on subtleties that mirror societal views on gender and politeness. Drawing from conversational analysis data reveals that gender not impacts adherence, to the modesty maxim but also influences how politeness strategies are expressed across diverse cultural settings. The results highlight how language use is influenced by gender and societal expectations in shaping how we communicate. In the study of language and culture, in both English and Uzbek languages lies a focus, on maxims and gender characteristics through the lens of sociolinguistics and politeness theory.

PDF
DOI

References

1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

2. Holmes, J. (1999). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London:

Longman.

3. Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

4. Kaniyazova, A. B. (2024). Gender Differences in Language Use and Politeness Strategies. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(4), 17-23.

5. Shodieva, M. (2024). SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES: UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL CONTEXTS. Modern Science and Research, 3(1), 69-75.

6. Shodiyeva, M. (2023). SOCIOLINGUISTICS AND IDENTIFICATION IN THE CLASSROOM. Modern Science and Research, 2(12),

494-498.

7. Adizovna, S. M. (2023). Code-Switching and Multilingualism: Exploring the Dynamics of Language use in Uzbekistan. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769), 1(9), 549-553.

8. Shodieva, M. (2023). UNDERSTANDING SOCIOLINGUISTIC

APPROACH IN THE ENGLISH CLASSROOM. Modern Science and

Research, 2(10), 64-68.

9. Maftunabonu, S. (2023). THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

TRADITIONAL AND MODERN TEACHING METHODS. Modern Science and Research, 2(10), 829-831.

10. Shodieva, M. (2023). MASTERING ENGLISH IN A MONTH:

EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR RAPID PROGRESS. In Academic International

Conference on Multi-Disciplinary Studies and Education (Vol. 1, No. 19, pp. 83- 87).

11. Shodieva, M. (2023). DEVELOPING SUMMARY WRITING SKILL IN ACADEMIC WRITING. Modern Science and Research, 2(9), 140-144.