Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024), Articles
Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024)

ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF ACADEMIC SOURCES

Articles
Published 2024-12-20
Mohira Xusanova
Jizzakh branch of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek The faculty of Psychology, department of Foreign languages Phylology and foreign languages
Muslima Adilova
Student of group 302-21
PDF
DOI

Keywords

authorship
credentials
peer review
publication outlet
references

How to Cite

ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF ACADEMIC SOURCES. (2024). "XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 2(12), 205-209. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/itfttdm/article/view/8929
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

This article discusses the critical process of assessing the credibility of academic sources, providing a comprehensive guide for researchers and students. It highlights key factors such as authorship and credentials, the peer review process, publication outlets, citations, bias, methodology, and the overall reputation of sources. The article emphasizes the importance of verifying the expertise of authors, ensuring transparency in research methods, and identifying potential biases to determine whether a source can be trusted. Additionally, it stresses the role of academic community recognition, such as citations and reviews, in confirming a source's reliability.
By following the strategies outlined in the article, readers can strengthen their research and ensure the integrity of their academic work.

PDF
DOI

References

1. Badke, W. (2017). Research Strategies: Finding your Way through the Information Fog.

Libraries Unlimited. 2. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.).

University of Chicago Press.

3. Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage.

4. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (50th Anniversary ed.). University of Chicago Press. 5. McMillan, V. E. (2012). Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences (5th ed.). Bedford/St.

Martin’s.

6. Northey, M., & Knight, D. (2013). Making Sense in the Social Sciences: A Student's Guide to

Research and Writing. Oxford University Press.

7. Stossel, T. (2014). The Importance of Peer Review in Academic Publishing. Journal of

Research Integrity, 25(3), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jri.v25i3.2021.

8. Khusanova, M. (2023). HISTORY OF USING TESTS IN MONITORING THE LEVEL OF QUALIFICATION. Science and innovation, 2(B7), 17-21 9. Mahira, K. (2024). METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS FOR A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER: MONITORING AND ASSESSING SKILLS. Multidisciplinary and

Multidimensional Journal, 3(10), 10-15.