BORROWING WORDS IN THE FIELD OF POLITICS
PDF
DOI

Keywords

politics discourse, linguistic implications, language borrowing, adaptation, political communication, linguistic diversity, semantic extension.

How to Cite

Karimova Charos Yarashevna, & Davlyatova Elvira Muradovna. (2024). BORROWING WORDS IN THE FIELD OF POLITICS. "XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 2(5), 553–556. Retrieved from https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/itfttdm/article/view/5995

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of complex borrowed words in the realm of politics, focusing on the linguistic and sociopolitical implications of such borrowings. Drawing on a corpus of political discourse from various languages, the analysis reveals the intricate ways in which borrowed words are integrated into political communication and discourse. Through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, this research sheds light on the processes of borrowing, adaptation, and semantic extension that characterize the use of complex borrowed words in political contexts. The findings contribute to our understanding of the role of language in shaping political ideologies and power dynamics, highlighting the complex interplay between linguistic diversity and political discourse.

PDF
DOI

References

Auer, P. (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity. Routledge.

Myers-Scotton, C. (2006). Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Blackwell Publishing.

Milroy, L., & Muysken, P. (Eds.). (1995). One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge University Press.

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7-8), 581-618.

Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 3-47). Oxford University Press.