Abstract
This article presents a linguocultural analysis of toponyms derived from color names in both English and Uzbek languages. The study explores how color terms are used in place names, reflecting cultural, historical, and environmental aspects of the respective communities
References
1. Kadmon, N. (2000). Toponymy: The Lore, Laws, and Language of Geographical Names. Vantage Press.
2. Tent, J., & Blair, D. (2011). Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames. Names, 59(2), 67-89.
3. Stewart, G. R. (1970). Names on the Land: A Historical Account of PlaceNaming in the United States. Houghton Mifflin.
4. Azaryahu, M. (1996). The power of commemorative street names. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(3), 311-330.
5. Nash, C. (2013). Cultural geography: Place names and identity. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 493-509.
6. Berg, L. D., & Vuolteenaho, J. (Eds.). (2009). Critical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming. Ashgate.7. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
8. Fedorov, A. V. (2015). Linguistic and cultural aspects of toponymy in Central Asia. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 45-56.
9. Comrie, B., Matthews, S., & Polinsky, M. (2003). The Atlas of Languages. Routledge.
10. Utebaeva, A., & Tursunov, B. (2018). The role of color symbolism in Uzbek toponyms. Journal of Central Asian Studies, 5(2), 112-120.
