Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
In this article, discussing the importance of evaluation in determining student‘ reading proficiency in higher education is the paper‘s primary objective. Assisting teachers in determining evaluation criteria and providing students with feedback on their progress in reading comprehension is another objective. The article also describes how assessment methods and evaluation standards are used to different reading comprehension skill levels. The research paper‘s final objective is to show teachers and students the advantages of formative assessment.
References
1. Auerbach ER, Paxton D. It’s not the English thing: Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1997. P 31 2. Carrell PL. Can Reading strategies Be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.1998. p21 3. Huang H. Formative assessment in a classroom in China: The current situation, predicament and future. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2014. P 18 4. Alderson JC, Haapakangas E-LA, Huhta LN, Ullakonoja R. The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language. New York, NY: Routledge.2015. P265 5. Magliano JP, Millis KK, Ozuru Y, McNamara DS. A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools. In: McNamara DS, editor. Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2007. P 107
6. Afflerbach P, Cho BY, Kim JY. Conceptualizing and assessing higher- order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice. 2015. P 54 7. Rouet JF, Britt MA. Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In: McCrudden MT, Magliano JP, Schraw G, editors. Relevance Instructions and Goal- Focusing in-Text Learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2011. P 19-52 8. Breen MP, Barratt-Pugh C, Derewianka B, House H, Hudson C, Lumley T, et al.
How Teachers Interpret and Use National and State Assessment Frameworks Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs; 1997.
P 91-128
9. Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education. 1998. P 71 10. Anderson RC, Biddle WB. On asking people questions about what they are reading. In: Bower GH, editor. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975. p89 11. King-Sears ME, Burgess M, Lawson TL. Applying curriculum-based assessment in inclusive settings. Teaching Exceptional Children. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1999. P30 12. Anderson P, Fearnley-Sander M, Anzai D, Walker M, Mendelovits J, TurnerR,Shaping Reading Pedagogy and Assessment for Sustainable Learning. UKFIET. 2015. Available from: https://research.acer.edu.au/monitoring_learning/24 13. Kendeou P, McMaster KL, Christ TJ. Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.2016. p69 14. Douglas BH. Language Assessment—Assessing Reading Full Description with Picture and Chart. 2015. P185 15. Barr RB, Tagg J. Stakeholders’ perceptions and implications of References Teacher Training and Practice classroom-based Reading assessment: A literature review, a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change. 1995. p13-25 16. Brown DH. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education; 2004 17. Rethinasamy S, Ramanair J. Developing Rubrics For Performance Based Assessment Through Collaborative Effort. 2021 18. Mermelstein AD. Reading Level Placement and Assessment for ESL/EFL Learners: The Reading Level Measurement Method. ORTESOL Journal. 2015. P44- 55
19. Trim J, editor. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – A Guide for Users. Strasbourg: Langauge Policy Division, Council of Europe; 2001. 20. Venn J. The diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 2007. P10-19 21. Richek MA, Caldwell JS, Jennings JH, Lerner JW. Reading Problems:Assessment and Teaching Strategies. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc; 2002 22. Perera-Diltz D, Moe J. Formative and summative assessment in online education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching. 2014. P130-142
23. Linse C, Nunan D. Incorporating Reading in Writing Classes and its Effects on ESL Learners’ Writing. Practical English Language Teaching.
Creative Education. McGraw-Hill; 2005. P121-134 24. Cohen AD. The process of responding to an assessment instrument.
In: Assessing language ability in the classroom. 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 1994. P115
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.