Abstract
Ushbu maqolada Onlayn mediatsiyani tahlil qilish jarayonida uni qo’llash bilan bog’liq afzalliklar va kamchiliklar tahlil etilgan bo’lib, onlayn mediatsiyaning afzalliklari sifatida mediatsiya jarayonining olib borishdagi qulayliklar, jumladan harajatlarning kamligi, yurisdiksiya muommosining yo’qligi va imkoniyati cheklangan shaxslar uchun qulayligi keltiriladigan bo’lsa, kamchiliklari sifatida esa inson hissiyotining yetishmasligi, internet tarmog’iga kirishdagi muommolar, maxfiylik va xavfsizlik tizimidagi kamchiliklar keltirilib o’tiladi. Yuqorida keltirilib o’tilgan kamchiliklar va muommolar atroflicha o’rganilib, ularga muqobil yechimlar taklif etiladi. Ushbu fikrlar asosida yakuniy shaxsiy fikrlar bayon etiladi. Xulosa qilinadiki, onlayn mediatsiya instituti nizolarni hal etishda alohida ahamiyatga ega va uni qo’llash jarayonidagi muommolarga muqobil yechimlar ham mavjud.
References
Yevropa Parlamenti va Kengashining 2008-yil 21-maydagi 52-sonli fuqarolik va tijorat sohalarida mediatsiyani qo’llash bilan bog’liq Direktivasi.
Yevropa Parlamenti va Kengashining 2013-yil 21-maydagi 524/2013-sonli “Iste’molchi nizolari bo‘yicha nizolarni onlayn hal etish” to’g’risidagi reglamenti.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2018-yil 03-iyuldagi “Mediatsiya to‘g‘risida”gi qonuni.
Regulation anda practical problems of jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal (based on UNCITRAL Model Law). Dissertatsiya. M.B.Bakhramovna.
Harold Abramson, Problem-Solving Advocacy in Mediations: A Model of Client Representation, 10 HARV. NEGOT. L. REV. 103, 106 (2005).
Donna Shestowsky, Procedural Preferences in Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Closer, Modern Look at an Old Idea, 10 PSYCHOL. PUB. POL'Y & L. 211, 214 (2004)
Linda Brannack, Resolving Disputes Between Physicians & Nurses: How to Get the Most from ADR in the Health Care Industry, 56-JUL DIsp. RESOL. J. 46, 48 (2001).
E. Casey Lide, ADR and Cyberspace: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Online Commerce, Intellectual Property and Defamation, 12 OHIO ST. J. ON DISP. RESOL. 193, at 208 (1996).
George H. Friedman, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Emerging Online Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities, 19 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 695, 712 (1997).
Nurumbetova, S. (2022). VAIN ASPECTS OF PRACTICAL RELIGIOUS EXAMINATION IN THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES RELATED TO PROHIBITED RELIGIOUS MATERIALS. Science and Innovation, 1(6), 108-113.
Nizolarni hal qilishning muqobil usullari/O’quv qo’llanma. Yuridik fanlar bo’yicha falsafa doktori (PhD), dotsent v.b. I.M.Salimova. – Toshkent: TDYU, 2022. – 208 bet.
Foydalanilgan internet manbalar:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.