Keywords
robotized technological system
OEE
manufacturing efficiency
predictive maintenance
digital twin
PLC
MES
automation
industrial enterprise
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the organizational and technological foundations for improving the efficiency of robotized technological systems in industrial enterprises. Rather than treating the robot as an isolated machine, the study frames it as a component of a cyber-physical production system integrated with process equipment, sensors, PLC/SCADA, material flow, and manufacturing management systems. According to the International Federation of Robotics, 542,076 new industrial robots were installed worldwide in 2024 and the operational stock reached approximately 4.66 million units; Asia/Australia accounted for 74% of new installations, Europe 16%, and the Americas 9%. Global robot density rose to 177 units per 10,000 manufacturing employees. The study integrates OEE, takt and cycle time, MTBF, MTTR, defect rate, energy consumption, predictive maintenance, and digital-twin monitoring into a unified efficiency framework. The results show that robotization alone does not guarantee superior performance; the largest economic benefits arise when the robot, technological process, maintenance system, and production logistics are optimized as one integrated system.References
1. International Federation of Robotics. (2025). World Robotics 2025: Industrial Robots. Frankfurt: IFR.
2. International Federation of Robotics. (2026). Robot density surges in Europe, Asia, and Americas. IFR Press Release.
3. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Productivity Press.
4. Muchiri, P., & Pintelon, L. (2008). Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature review and practical application discussion. International Journal of Production Research, 46(13), 3517–3535.
5. Stamatis, D. H. (2017). The OEE Primer: Understanding Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Reliability, and Maintainability. CRC Press.
6. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.
7. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415.
8. Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024.
9. Mobley, R. K. (2002). An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
10. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press.
11. Groover, M. P. (2020). Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (5th ed.). Pearson.
12. Siciliano, B., & Khatib, O. (Eds.). (2016). Springer Handbook of Robotics (2nd ed.). Springer.
13. ISO. (2011). ISO 10218-1:2011 Robots and robotic devices—Safety requirements for industrial robots—Part 1: Robots. International Organization for Standardization.
14. ISO. (2011). ISO 10218-2:2011 Robots and robotic devices—Safety requirements for industrial robots—Part 2: Robot systems and integration. International Organization for Standardization.
15. Villani, V., Pini, F., Leali, F., & Secchi, C. (2018). Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechatronics, 55, 248–266.
16. Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Shodmon Erkinovich Boyirov
