ISSN 3030-3001 Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF
DOI

Keywords

abdominoplasty

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND PRACTICAL EFFICACY OF ABDOMINOPLASTY AND LIPOSUCTION. (2026). MEDICINE, PEDAGOGY AND TECHNOLOGY: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 4(6), 11-14. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/mpttp/article/view/19471

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of abdominoplasty and liposuction procedures widely used in modern aesthetic plastic surgery, highlighting their clinical significance, indications for use, advantages, limitations, and practical effectiveness. Literature analysis shows that liposuction is an effective method for correcting local fatty deposits, while abdominoplasty yields high results in cases of skin ptosis of the anterior abdominal wall, muscle diastasis, and tissue relaxation. In modern approaches, it is possible to improve aesthetic and functional results by combining these two methods, specifically through lipoabdominoplasty.

PDF
DOI

References

1. Блохин С.Н., Вульф И.А. Пластическая хирургия тела. – Москва: МЕДпресс-информ, 2019. – 544 с.

2. Пшениснов К.П. Эстетическая пластическая хирургия. – Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, 2021. – 742 с.

3. Адамян Р.Т. Современные технологии в эстетической хирургии тела. // Анналы пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии. – 2022. – №3. –С. 15–24.

4. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS Global Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures. – Annual Reports, 2022–2025.

5. Saldanha O. Lipoabdominoplasty: Evolution and Current Concepts. // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. – 2022. – Vol. 46, №1. – P. 75–88.

6. Rohrich R.J. Body Contouring and Liposuction. – Dallas: Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation, 2018. – 450 p

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.