MACROECONOMIC STABILITY AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS: ANALYZING INFLATION, UNEMPLOYMENT, AND THEIR IMPACT ON COHESION, POVERTY, AND INEQUALITY IN UZBEKISTAN
PDF
DOI

Keywords

Macroeconomic stability
Inflation
Unemployment
Social cohesion

How to Cite

MACROECONOMIC STABILITY AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS: ANALYZING INFLATION, UNEMPLOYMENT, AND THEIR IMPACT ON COHESION, POVERTY, AND INEQUALITY IN UZBEKISTAN. (2024). Journal of Science-Innovative Research in Uzbekistan, 2(12), 162-174. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/jsiru/article/view/8649

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between macroeconomic stability indicators—specifically inflation and unemployment—and their impacts on social cohesion, poverty, and income inequality in Uzbekistan. Using econometric models and data from 2018 to 2022, the research highlights the dual role of inflation and unemployment in shaping social outcomes. The findings reveal that higher inflation and unemployment undermine social cohesion and exacerbate poverty and income inequality, while economic growth, social expenditure, education, and political stability mitigate these effects. By integrating macroeconomic and social policies, Uzbekistan can achieve sustainable development, balancing economic reforms with social inclusion. The study underscores the importance of controlling inflation, fostering employment, and investing in social welfare and education to build a resilient, equitable society.

PDF
DOI

References

1. Alnaqbi, N. M., Fouda, W., & Balbaa, M. E. (2023). Leveraging Social Media Data Fusion for Enhanced Student Evolution in Media Studies using Machine Learning. Journal of Fusion: Practice and Applications, 12(2), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.120215

2. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Uzbekistan: Promoting Sustainable Development and Green Energy. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org

3. Balbaa, M. E., & Abdurashidova, M. S. (2023). Digitalization processes in the energy complex of Uzbekistan. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS), 10(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra12767

4. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

5. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: The EKC Hypothesis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000214

6. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

7. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. OECD Publishing.

8. UNCTAD. (2020). World Investment Report 2020: International Production Beyond the Pandemic. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/webflyer/world-investment-report-2020

9. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2021). Sustainable Development in Uzbekistan: Challenges and Opportunities. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.uz.undp.org

10. World Bank. (2020). Uzbekistan Country Environmental Analysis: Pathways to Sustainable Development. World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.