TYPES OF MORPHEMES AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION. MORPEMIC ANALYSES. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.
PDF
DOI

Keywords

linguistic, classification of morpheme, derivational, inflectional, free and bound

How to Cite

Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi, & Moʻminova Sevinch Berdimurod qizi. (2023). TYPES OF MORPHEMES AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION. MORPEMIC ANALYSES. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. "XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 1(12), 104–108. Retrieved from https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/itfttdm/article/view/3176

Abstract

This article examines the fascinating field of Morphemes and its types, classifications. Morphemic analysis.Structural analysis and how they are essential and often challenging aspect of learning English.Morphemes are the smallest units of language that carry meaning. They can be classified into different types based on their function and meaning within a word. Understanding the different types of morphemes is crucial for gaining insight into the structure of words and how they contribute to the overall meaning of a language.In English grammar and morphology, a morpheme is a meaningful linguistic unit consisting of a word such as dog, or a word element, such as the -s at the end of dogs, that can't be divided into smaller meaningful parts.

PDF
DOI

References

Collins Cobuild Dictionary of PHRASAL VERBS. Londons Harper Collins pulisher, 1991.

Shirinova,G.I.MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF WORDS.WORD FAMILIES AIMS AND PRENCIPLES OF MORPHEMIC AND WORD-FORMATION ANALYSIS.НАУЧНЫЙ ИМПУЛЬС.НО.”15”2023.

Kunin A. V. English phraseology (theoretical course). M.: Higher school, 1970. 341 p.

MacArthur T. Teaching English Phrasal Verbs (Second edition). London and Glasgow: Collins, 1975

Povey J. English phrasal verbs and their use: textbook. Allowance. M.: Higher school, 1990. 176 p.

Teshaboyeva, N., & Mamayoqubova, S. (2020). COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH TO LANGUAGE TEACHING. In МОЛОДОЙ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (pp. 409-414).

Teshaboyeva, N. (2020). LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY, ITS STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE NEW PERSPECTIVE DIRECTIONS. In МОЛОДОЙ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (pp. 415-420). 8.Ma’ripov J. Antroposentrizm–tilshunoslikning zamonaviy yonalishi sifatida //Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 28. – С. 62-68.

Ахmеdоvа S. R. и др. Mаsоfаviy tа’lim vа uning hоrijiy tillаrni o’qitishdаgi o’rni //Science and Education. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 10. – С. 608-612.

Ахmedova, S. R. (2021). Chet tillarni o’rganish va undagi metodlarning ahamiyati. Science and Education, 2(11), 1076-1080. 11.Moʻminova Sevinch Berdimurod qizi. (2023). PHRASAL VERBS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS. “XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR” Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-amaliy Konferensiyasi, 1(11), 219–223.

Toshmamtova,O.D.UNVEILING THE WONDERS OF ETYMOLOGY: EXPLORING THE INTRIGUING WORLD OF WORD ORIGINS.ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ И НАУКА В XXI ВЕКЕ.Выпуск №44-3 (ноябрь, 2023).67-72.