MODAL FE’LLARNING CHOG‘ISHTIRMA-SEMANTIK TAHLILI (INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARI MISOLIDA)
DOI
PDF

Keywords

modallik, modal fe’llar, chog‘ishtirma semantika, epistemik modallik, deontik modallik, dinamik modallik, zaruriyat, imkoniyat, analitik konstruktsiya, pragmatika.

How to Cite

MODAL FE’LLARNING CHOG‘ISHTIRMA-SEMANTIK TAHLILI (INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARI MISOLIDA). (2026). Yangi O’zbekistonda Tabiiy Va Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Fanlar Respublika Ilmiy Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 4(01), 174-181. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/gumanitar/article/view/16158

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada modallik kategoriyasining ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida ifodalanish usullari chog‘ishtirma-semantik yondashuvda tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning markazida ingliz tilidagi modal yordamchi fe’llarning (can/could, may/might, must, shall/should, will/would, ought to, need, dare) semantik yadrosi hamda ularning kontekstga bog‘liq pragmatik nozikliklari turadi. O‘zbek tilida modallikning grammatiklashgan paradigma sifatida modal yordamchi fe’llar orqali emas, balki modal so‘zlar (kerak, lozim, zarur, shart, mumkin, ehtimol), mayl shakllari va analitik konstruksiyalar (…ishi kerak, …ish mumkin, …sa bo‘ladi, …sa kerak) orqali ifodalanishi ko‘rsatiladi. 

DOI
PDF

References

1. Palmer, F. R. Mood and Modality. 2-nashr. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

2. Huddleston, R.; Pullum, G. K. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

3. Kratzer, A. Modality. In: Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 1991.

4. Bybee, J.; Perkins, R.; Pagliuca, W. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press, 1994.

5. Coates, J. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. Croom Helm, 1983.

6. Quirk, R.; Greenbaum, S.; Leech, G.; Svartvik, J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, 1985.