Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF

Keywords

cinema discourse
linguocultureme
lexemic linguocultureme
national cinema
structural classification
denotative meaning
connotative meaning
semantic transformation
cultural code
comparative analysis

How to Cite

STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF LEXEMIC LINGUOCULTUREMES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH NATIONAL CINEMAS. (2026). Yangi O’zbekistonda Tabiiy Va Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Fanlar Respublika Ilmiy Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 4(11), 25-29. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/gumanitar/article/view/21215

Abstract

This thesis analyzes the structural-semantic features of lexemic linguoculturemes used in Uzbek and English national cinemas in a comparative aspect. It describes the five stages of an ordinary lexical unit acquiring the status of a linguocultureme and the four historical-communicative stages of linguoculturemes. Cinema, as a type of media discourse, integrates verbal, visual, and auditory means, comprehensively reflecting the culture, lifestyle, and history of a nation. In national films, linguoculturemes, the linguistic form of culture, are manifested through characters' speech, clothing, rituals, and daily interactions. In the current era of accelerated globalization and intercultural communication, national films are becoming one of the main tools for introducing a nation's identity to other cultures. Therefore, a comparative study of linguoculturemes in Uzbek and English national cinemas from structural, semantic, and contextual perspectives is a pressing task for medialinguistics, linguoculturology, and comparative linguistics. The research material included Uzbek films "Mahallada duv-duv gap" and "Suyunchi," and English films "Four Weddings and a Funeral" and "A Private Function." A total of 180 linguoculturemes (80 from Uzbek, 100 from English cinema discourse) were identified, of which 134 were analyzed as lexemic linguoculturemes. Comparative, classification, component, semantic, structural, and contextual-pragmatic analysis methods were used in the study. Quantitative analysis showed the distribution of simple, derivative, compound (collocational), and paired lexemic linguoculturemes in films of both languages. The results can be applied in preparing educational materials for linguocultureme dictionaries, lexicology, linguoculturology, and comparative linguistics.
PDF

References

Agar M. Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. – New York: William Morrow and Company, 1994.

Воробьев В.В. Лингвокультурология (теория и методы). – М.: Изд-во РУДН, 1997.

Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. – М.: Академия, 2001.

Mamatov A. Zamonaviy lingvistika. – Toshkent: Tafakkur avlodi, 2020.

Степанов Ю.С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. – М.: Языки русской культуры, 1997.

Телия В.Н. Русская фразеология: семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. – М.: Языки русской культуры, 1996.

Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org

O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. 5 jildlik. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2006–2008.

Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 2008. – 320 b.

Sharifian F. Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017.

Four Weddings and a Funeral [Film]. Rej. Mike Newell. – Buyuk Britaniya, 1994.

A Private Function [Film]. Rej. Malcolm Mowbray. – Buyuk Britaniya, 1984.

Whorf B.L. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1956.

Mahallada duv-duv gap [Film]. Rej. Shuhrat Abbosov. – O‘zbekfilm, 1960.

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.