Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF

Keywords

crafts discourse
lexical-semantic system
terminological layer
evaluative vocabulary
conceptual metaphor
culturally coded vocabulary
non-equivalent vocabulary
isomorphism
allomorphism

How to Cite

ISOMORPHIC AND ALLOMORPHIC FEATURES OF THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC SYSTEM OF CRAFTS DISCOURSE IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. (2026). Yangi O’zbekistonda Tabiiy Va Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Fanlar Respublika Ilmiy Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 4(11), 20-24. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/gumanitar/article/view/21214

Abstract

This thesis comparatively and contrastively analyzes the lexical-semantic system of crafts discourse using English and Uzbek language materials. Terminological, common, evaluative, metaphorical-figurative, culturally coded, and functional lexical layers are identified, and their functions within the discourse are elucidated. The analysis reveals isomorphic situations where functional-semantic mechanisms correspond in both languages (terminological equivalence, evaluative gradation, metaphorical persuasion), as well as allomorphic differences related to non-equivalent vocabulary, the origin of terminology, and cultural values. Crafts have historically been intertwined with the economic, cultural, and aesthetic life of society, a connection clearly reflected in the language system, primarily in the lexical layer. This study aims to compare the lexical layers of crafts discourse in English and Uzbek, identifying their isomorphic and allomorphic characteristics. Descriptive, comparative, component, contextual-pragmatic, and linguocultural analysis methods were employed.
PDF

References

1. Bhatia V.K. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. – London: Longman, 1993.

2. Hakimov M. O‘zbek pragmalingvistikasi asoslari. – Toshkent: Akademnashr, 2013.

3. Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. – London: Longman, 1976. – 375 p.

4. Khasanova N. Hunarmandchilik diskursining lingvokulturologik asoslari // Samarqand davlat universiteti ilmiy axboroti. – 2024.

5. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. – 242 p.

6. Martin J.R., White P.R.R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

7. Mahmudov N.M. O‘zbek tilidagi sodda gaplarda semantik-sintaktik asimmetriya. – Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 1984. – 156 b.

8. Ergasheva G. Kommunikativ-pragmatik yondashuvda hunarmandchilik diskursi // Filologiya va madaniyat jurnali. – 2023.

9. Schiffrin D. Discourse Markers. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 364 p.

10. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2008. – 318 b.

11. Charteris-Black J. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

12. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

13. Van Dijk T.A. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. – London: Longman, 1977. – 261 p.

14. Wierzbicka A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. – Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991.

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.