How to Cite
Abstract
Ushbu ishda avtomobil, tibbiyot va moliya sohalarida faoliyat ko'rsatuvchi avtonom sun'iy intellekt tizimlari zarar yetkazganda qaysi shaxs yoki tashkilot javob berishi lozimligiga oid huquqiy savol ko'rib chiqiladi. O'zbekiston Fuqarolik Kodeksining 985–1007-moddalari bu munosabatlarga mos kelmasligi dalillar bilan ko'rsatiladi. Yevropa Ittifoqi, AQSh va Xitoy tajribalari asosida milliy qonunchilikni rivojlantirish yo'nalishlari tavsiya etiladi.
References
1. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (1997, keyingi o'zgarishlar bilan). lex.uz/docs/111181
2. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-198-son Farmoni (13.03.2023). lex.uz/docs/6385707
3. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the EU, July 2024. eur-lex.europa.eu
4. Cyberspace Administration of China. Algorithm Recommendation Provisions, 2022. cac.gov.cn
II. Xalqaro standartlar
5. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. iso.org/standard/81230
6. OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence (2019, updated 2024). oecd.ai
III. Sudlov amaliyoti
7. ECHR. Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, No. 58170/13, 25 May 2021. hudoc.echr.coe.int
8. NHTSA. Automated Vehicles for Safety. U.S. Department of Transportation. nhtsa.gov
IV. Ilmiy maqolalar
9. Doshi-Velez F., Kortz M. Accountability of AI Under the Law. Harvard, 2017. ssrn.com
10. Floridi L. et al. An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 2018. doi.org
11. Calo R. Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 2017. lawreview.ucdavis.edu
V. Elektron manbalar
12. O'zbekiston Qonunchilik ma'lumotlari tizimi: lex.uz
13. Stanford AI Index 2024: aiindex.stanford.edu
14. World Bank Governance Indicators 2023: worldbank.org
15. OECD.AI Policy Observatory: oecd.ai