Abstract
O'zbek tilida
Ushbu ishda avtomobil, tibbiyot va moliya sohalarida faoliyat ko'rsatuvchi avtonom sun'iy intellekt tizimlari zarar yetkazganda qaysi shaxs yoki tashkilot javob berishi lozimligiga oid huquqiy savol ko'rib chiqiladi. O'zbekiston Fuqarolik Kodeksining 985–1007-moddalari bu munosabatlarga mos kelmasligi dalillar bilan ko'rsatiladi. Yevropa Ittifoqi, AQSh va Xitoy tajribalari asosida milliy qonunchilikni rivojlantirish yo'nalishlari tavsiya etiladi.
References
Qonun va me'yoriy hujjatlar
O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (1997, keyingi o'zgarishlar bilan). lex.uz/docs/111181
O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-198-son Farmoni (13.03.2023). lex.uz/docs/6385707
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the EU, July 2024. eur-lex.europa.eu
Cyberspace Administration of China. Algorithm Recommendation Provisions, 2022. cac.gov.cn
II. Xalqaro standartlar
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. iso.org/standard/81230
OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence (2019, updated 2024). oecd.ai
III. Sudlov amaliyoti
ECHR. Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, No. 58170/13, 25 May 2021. hudoc.echr.coe.int
NHTSA. Automated Vehicles for Safety. U.S. Department of Transportation. nhtsa.gov
IV. Ilmiy maqolalar
Doshi-Velez F., Kortz M. Accountability of AI Under the Law. Harvard, 2017. ssrn.com
Floridi L. et al. An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 2018. doi.org
Calo R. Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 2017. lawreview.ucdavis.edu
V. Elektron manbalar
O'zbekiston Qonunchilik ma'lumotlari tizimi: lex.uz
Stanford AI Index 2024: aiindex.stanford.edu
World Bank Governance Indicators 2023: worldbank.org
OECD.AI Policy Observatory: oecd.ai
