USING SELF AND PEER ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ WRITING SKILLS

Authors

  • Yusupov Asadbek 3rd year student, Foreign language and literature (English), faculty of Languages, Termez state pedagogical institute Author

Keywords:

Self-assessment, Peer assessment, Writing skills, Language learners, Learner autonomy, English language teaching.

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of self-assessment and peer assessment techniques in enhancing the writing skills of language learners. These approaches promote learner autonomy, critical thinking, and constructive feedback, which are crucial for improving writing accuracy and fluency. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of writing performance before and after intervention with qualitative data from learner feedback and reflections. The results indicate that incorporating self and peer assessment in the language classroom significantly improves writing quality, learner motivation, and awareness of linguistic features. The study also discusses challenges and recommendations for effective implementation of these assessment strategies. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of training both teachers and learners to effectively implement these assessment methods, ensuring a supportive environment that encourages honest and constructive feedback. This approach not only improves writing skills but also prepares learners for lifelong autonomous learning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.

2. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Higher and Further Education. Routledge.

3. Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101.

4. Liu, J., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.

5. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10), 1–13.

6. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.

7. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

8. Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27.

9. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181.

10. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

USING SELF AND PEER ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ WRITING SKILLS. (2025). MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL: FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 1(6), 246-250. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/fundamental/article/view/13023