Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF
DOI

Keywords

nteractive teaching methods
student engagement
personalized learning
technology in education

How to Cite

INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS: NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN THE TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS. (2025). FAN, TA’LIM, TEXNOLOGIYA VA ISHLAB CHIQARISH INTEGRATSIYASI ASOSIDA RIVOJLANISH ISTIQBOLLARI, 2(1), 47-51. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/fan/article/view/9265

Abstract

This article explores the role of interactive teaching methods in modern education, emphasizing their potential to enhance the teaching and learning process. It highlights how interactive approaches, including the use of technology like gamification, collaborative platforms, and virtual reality, can increase student engagement and foster deeper understanding. The article discusses the benefits of personalized learning, critical skill development, and immediate feedback, while also acknowledging the challenges teachers face, such as technology access and the need for professional development. Ultimately, the piece argues that interactive teaching is a crucial advancement in education, offering new opportunities for more dynamic, effective, and inclusive learning environments.

PDF
DOI

References

1. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 78(4), 772-790.

2. Boulos, M. N. K., & Liang, H. N. (2018). Augmented reality in education: A new technology to support the learning process. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 74-83. 3. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.

Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.

4. Gok, T. (2013). The use of technology in education: A review of the literature.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 195-216.

5. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii

International Conference on System Sciences, 3025-3034.

6. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments.

Instructional Design Theories and Models, Volume II: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 215-239.

7. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in

Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.

8. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.

International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

9. Tüzün,

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.