Keywords
hedjirlash
ehtiyotkorlik ma’nosi
epistemik modallik
How to Cite
Abstract
Maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek akademik matnlarida ilmiy fikrni ehtiyotkor, chegaralangan va dalilga mos shaklda ifodalovchi hedjirlash vositalari qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Ingliz tilidagi may, might, appear, suggest, likely kabi birliklar hamda o‘zbek tilidagi mumkin, ehtimol, ko‘rinadiki, deb hisoblash mumkin, ayrim hollarda kabi shakllarning semantik-pragmatik vazifalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Hedjirlashning noaniqlik belgisi emas, balki ilmiy xulosaning chegarasini ko‘rsatish, muqobil talqin uchun joy qoldirish va muallif pozitsiyasini me’yorlashtirish vositasi ekanligi asoslanadi
References
1. Hyland K. Hedjirlash in Scientific Research Articles. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. – 307 p.
2. Hyland K., Milton J. Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 1997. – Vol. 6, No. 2. – P. 183–205.
3. Hyland K. Writing without conviction? Hedjirlash in science research articles // Applied Linguistics. – 1996. – Vol. 17, No. 4. – P. 433–454.
4. Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. – London: Longman, 1999.
5. Flowerdew J. The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality? // Language Teaching. – 2019. – Vol. 52, No. 2. – P. 249–260.
6. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2008.
