Abstract
This article is about approaches and will give a definition for stylistics, metonymy, metaphor, homonymy and their similarities and provide some examples. A metonymy is a word or phrase that is used to stand in for another word. Metaphors are a form of figurative language, which refers to words or expressions that mean something different from their literal definition. In the case of metaphors, the literal interpretation would often be pretty silly. For example, imagine what these metaphors would look like if you took them at face value: Love is a battlefield. Homonymy is recognized as a language universal. It creates lexical ambiguity in that a single form has two or more different meanings. For example: 1.ball, n - a sphere, any spherical body. 2.ball, n, a large dancing party.
References
Arnold. 1. The English Word. Moscow. 1986.
Gaybullayeva, N. D. K., & Kizi, T. N. Z. (2022). THE ROLE OF INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN TEACHING LANGUAGE LEARNERS FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND MAINLY ENGLISH. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS), 2(10), 8-10.
Lipka, L. English Lexicology. Tubingen: Narr. 2002.
Punga L. Words about words. An introduction to English Lexicology. 2007.
R. S. Ginzburg , S. S. Khidekel, G. Y. Knyazeva, A. A. SankinA COURSE IN MODERN ENGLISH LEXICOLOGY SECOND EDITION Revised and Enlarged
Teshaboyeva, N., & Mamayoqubova, S. (2020). COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH TO LANGUAGE TEACHING. In МОЛОДОЙ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (pp. 409-414).
Teshaboyeva, N. (2020). LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY, ITS STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE NEW PERSPECTIVE DIRECTIONS. In МОЛОДОЙ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (pp. 415-420).
Teshaboyeva, N. Z. (2019). TEACHING ENGLISH THROUGH LITERATURE INTESL AND TEFL CLASSROOMS. In СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ: АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ, ДОСТИЖЕНИЯ И ИННОВАЦИИ (pp. 82-84).
Teshaboyeva, N. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF TOURISM IN PRESENT DAY. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 5(5).
Ma’ripov J. K. A BRIEF INFORMATION ABOUT TENSES //OʻZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI OLIY VA OʻRTA. – С. 464.
Tolibovna A. K. et al. Features Of Anthropocentric Study Of Sacred Texts //Open Access Repository. – 2022. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 5-10.
Tolibovna A. K. et al. Functions of Allusion and Allusion as a Marker of Intertextuality and Precedence //European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science. – 2022. – Т. 6. – С. 485-487.
Ma’ripov J. KORPUS HAQIDA UMUMIY TUSHUNCHA //Центральноазиатский журнал образования и инноваций. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 175-178.
Ma’ripov J. Antroposentrizm–tilshunoslikning zamonaviy yonalishi sifatida //Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 28. – С. 62-68.
Solnyshkina M. I. et al. IMPORTANCE OF SETTING GOALS. SMART GOALS //Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 11. – С. 318-320.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.