NOTICING PRAGMATIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN L1 AND L2 COMMUNICATION

Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi; Igor Chekulay Vladimirovich; : Po’latova Guli Nuriddin qizi

Authors

Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi Jizzakh branch of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek
Igor Chekulay Vladimirovich The Faculty of Psychology, the department of Foreign languages Philology and teaching languages
: Po’latova Guli Nuriddin qizi Professor of the Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation.

Keywords:

lexical acquisition, L1 & L2 similarities and differences, input, methods, usage-based theory, chunking, phonological representation, constraints.

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on similarities and differences between first. and second language lexical acquisition. After a brief discussion of differences in input, we go on to early lexical development, considering both the speed of acquisition as well as possible reasons for more efficient lexical learning in first language acquisition as compared to second language acquisition

References

1. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency. Continuum: London. Anderson, R. C. & Freebody, P. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Advances in Reading Language Research 2, 231-256.

2. Jack Richards, Designing instructional materials for teaching listening comprehension, in “The Language Teaching Matrix”, Cambridge, 1990

3. Mary Underwood (1989). Teaching Listening. Longman

4. Magnus Wilson. Discovery Listening – improving perceptual processing. ELT Journal Volume 57/4 (October 2003).

5. Ojha, D. D. R. (2023). Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi.

6. Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydullayevna “Teaching vocabulary in ELS classroom”. Anne Anderson and Tony Lynch (1988). Listening. Oxford University Press

7. Тешабоева, Н. (2023). Teaching writing as a major part of productive skills in mixed ability classes. Информатика и инженерные технологии, 1(2), 652-656.

8. Teshaboyeva, N. Z., & Niyatova, M. N. (2021). General meanings of the category of tenses. International Journal of Development and Public Policy, 1(6), 70-72.

9. Teshaboyeva, N. (2023). Compound sentences in the English language. Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari, 2(2), 68-70.

10. Teshaboyeva, N. Z., & Niyatova, M. N. (2022). The significant role of literature in teaching and learning process. International Journal of Development and Public Policy, 1(6), 70-72.

11. Zubaydulla, T. N. (2023). THE CLASSIFICATION OF SYNONYMS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES.". XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" nomli respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyasi, 1(12), 126-131.

12. Teshaboyeva, N., & Davlatboyeva, O. (2024). MODERN TRENDS IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Молодые ученые, 2(35), 108-111.

13. Teshaboyeva, N., & Erkaboyeva, S. (2024). TEACHING LISTENING WITH TECHNOLOGY. Молодые ученые, 2(35), 46-49.

14. Teshaboyeva, N., & Davlatboyeva, O. (2024). THE ROLE OF LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING. Молодые ученые, 2(35), 116-119.

15. Teshaboyeva, N., & Xatamova, M. (2024). ANALYZING LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL INTERACTION: PRAGMATICS, SPEECH ACT THEORY AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. Medicine, pedagogy and technology: theory and practice, 2(11), 329-336.