AFFECTION IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK SOCIAL MEDIA DISCOURSE
Keywords:
affection, digital communication, social media discourse, Sociolinguistics, Computer-mediated communication, gender differences, English language, Uzbek language, online interaction, emotional expressionAbstract
This article examines the expression of affection in digital communication through a comparative analysis of English and Uzbek social media discourse. The study focuses on how affectionate meanings are constructed and conveyed in online interaction, taking into account linguistic, cultural, and gender-related factors. In recent years, digital communication platforms such as Telegram, Instagram, and online messaging applications have significantly transformed interpersonal communication, influencing both the forms and strategies of emotional expression.
The research is grounded in the theoretical frameworks of Sociolinguistics and Computer-mediated communication. A qualitative comparative method is employed to analyze examples of online communication in English and Uzbek, including messages, comments, and social media interactions. Particular attention is paid to discourse strategies such as direct and indirect affectionate expressions, emoji usage, abbreviations, code-switching, and emotional intensification.
References
1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
2. Crystal, D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
3. Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
4. Herring, S. C. (ed.). Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. Indiana University Press, 2004.
5. Holmes, J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2013.
6. Lakoff, R. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
7. Tannen, D. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books, 1990.
8. van Dijk, T. A. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
9. Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.
10. Yule, G. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Internet Resources
11. Google Scholar – academic database for research articles on linguistics and communication.
12. JSTOR – digital library of academic journals in linguistics and social sciences.
13. ResearchGate – platform for accessing scientific publications in sociolinguistics and discourse analysis.
14. ScienceDirect – research database for studies on communication and language use.
15. SpringerLink – academic platform for linguistics and communication studies.
