SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL VIEWS ON THE STUDY OF DIPLOMATIC DISCOURSE IN LINGUISTICS
PDF
ZENODO

Keywords

Discourse, diplomatic discourse, communication, communicative strategy.

How to Cite

SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL VIEWS ON THE STUDY OF DIPLOMATIC DISCOURSE IN LINGUISTICS. (2025). Journal of Universal Science Research, 3(4), 266-272. http://universalpublishings.com/index.php/jusr/article/view/11193

Abstract

Diplomatic discourse is studied in linguistics as a complex form of communication in global politics. The scientific and theoretical research in this field focuses on analyzing the linguistic structures, pragmatic features, and the role of diplomatic discourse in its socio-cultural context. Typically, diplomatic discourse is a special form of official communication, aimed at ensuring mutual understanding, conducting negotiations, and managing international relations. In this type of discourse, specific linguistic characteristics such as caution in speech, the subtlety of diplomatic language, conflict mitigation, and adaptation to social and political contexts are given particular attention. Studying diplomatic discourse also provides a deeper understanding of how language is used in political and cultural processes, communication strategies, and the role of language in global communication.

PDF
ZENODO

References

1. Инжечик A. К истории развития понятия «дискурс» в современной лингвистике // Доклады Башкирского университета. – 2019. – №6. – C. 642.

2. Goodrich P. Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal analysis. – London: The Macmillan Press LTD, 1987. – P. 135

3. Harris Z. Discourse analysis // Language. Robins R. Н. General Linguistics. An Introductory Survey. – London, 1971. – Р. 27; 1952. – №1. – P.3.

4. Попова Е.А. Культурно-языковые характеристики политического дискурса (на материале газетних интервью). Дис. …канд. филол. наук. – Волгоград. 1995. – С. 187.

5. Shevchenko A. Discoursive analysis of mass media texts. // bulletin of Russian Communication Association “Theory of communication and applied communication”. Issue 1 / edited by I.N. Rozina, 2002. – P. 153-160. (168)

6. Фуко М. Археология знания / М.Фуко. – Киев: Ника – центр, 1996. – С. 207.

7. Степанов Ю.С. Альтернативный мир, Дискурс, Факт и принцип Причинности // Ю.С.Степанов // Язык и наука конца XX века. – М.: Российский Государственный гуманитарный институт, 1995. – С. 35-73.

8. Степанов Ю.С. Язык и метод. К современной философии языка / Ю.С. Степанов. – М.: “Языки русской культуры”, 1998. – С. 784.

9. Макаров М.Л. Интерпретативный анализ дискурса в малой группе / М.Л. Макаров. – Тверь: Изд-во Тверского госуд. университета, 1998. – С. 199.10.

10. Beaugrande de R. The Story of Discourse Analysis / R. de Beaugrande // Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. – London-Thousand Oaks – New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 1997. Vol.1. – P. 35-63.

11. Dijk van T.A. The Study of Discourse. Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction / van T.A.Dijk. – London – Thousand Oaks – New Delhi: SAGE Publications. – 1997. – Vol.1. – P. 352.

12. Nematov, O. (2022). HEAVY INDUSTRY INFRASTRUCTURE IN JIZZAKH PROVINCE: ACHIEVEMENTS, PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. International Journal Of History And Political Sciences, 2(11), 41-44.

13. Nematov, O. (2022). HEAVY INDUSTRY INFRASTRUCTURE IN JIZZAKH PROVINCE: ACHIEVEMENTS, PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. International Journal Of History And Political Sciences, 2(11), 41-44.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.