Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Silence is a potent instrument for communication that differs greatly between cultures. This article explores the operation of silence as a communication tool and affects of it in English and Uzbek interpersonal communications. The article emphasizes the value of contextual awareness in cross-cultural communication by examining the realization and usage of silence in both cultures.
References
1. Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. Nonverbal Communication. 2016. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
2. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday. 1959.pp. 22–38.
3. Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. 2003. McGraw-Hill.
4. Hall, E. T. Beyond Culture. 1976. Anchor Books.
5. Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. Understanding Politeness. 2013. Cambridge University Press.
6. Poggi, I., & Pelachaud, C. Embodied conversational agents and expressive nonverbal behavior. In I. Poggi & C. Pelachaud (Eds.), Modeling Nonverbal Behavior for Embodied Agents (pp. 267–275).2008. Springer.
7. Hall, E. T. The silent language. Doubleday. 1957. pp. 84–102
8. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. 2010. pp. 56–73.
9. Sarimsakova. Sh.U. O‘zaro muloqotda xushmuomalalikning verbal va noverbal vositalari. Namangan davlat universiteti Ilmiy axborotnomasi. №11 2023. -B.376-381.
10. Djumabaeva, J. S., & Avazmatova, M. M. (2022). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review.
11. Djumabaeva, J. S. (2015). Plesionymy and graduonymy in English and Uzbek. European Journal of Literature and Linguistics, (2), 55-58.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.