STYLISTIC FEATURES OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES AND THEIR REFLECTION IN UZBEK TRANSLATIONS
PDF
ZENODO

Keywords

Shakespeare, tragedy, stylistics, translation, Uzbek literature, poetic adaptation

How to Cite

STYLISTIC FEATURES OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES AND THEIR REFLECTION IN UZBEK TRANSLATIONS . (2025). Journal of Universal Science Research, 3(3), 94-99. http://universalpublishings.com/index.php/jusr/article/view/10503

Abstract

Shakespeare’s tragedies stand as masterpieces of world literature, distinguished by their profound psychological depth, complex character portrayals, and sophisticated stylistic devices. His use of poetic language, metaphor, rhetorical devices, and archaic expressions presents significant challenges for translators, particularly when adapting his works into Uzbek. This article examines the key stylistic features of Shakespeare’s tragedies, such as Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth, and King Lear, and analyzes how they are rendered in Uzbek translations. The study highlights the strategies employed by Uzbek translators to balance linguistic fidelity and cultural adaptation, ensuring that the essence of Shakespeare’s works is preserved.

PDF
ZENODO

References

1. Yuldashev, M. (2017). Shakespeare’s Influence on Uzbek Literature Translation Challenges. Tashkent University Press.

2. Kadirova, N. (2018). Shakespeare’s literary legacy and its impact on Uzbek literature. Tashkent State University Press.

3. Munday, J. (2016). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications (4th ed.). Routledge.

4. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.

5. Nurmuhamedov, A. (2021). Shakespeare’s wordplay and its challenges in Uzbek translation. Journal of Uzbek Linguistics and Translation Studies, 8(2), 45-60.

6. Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.

7. Wells, S. (2003). Shakespeare for all time. Oxford University Press.

8. Mamadiyorova Mariyam Kosim kizi, & Bakhtiyorova Maftuna Bakhtiyorovna. (2025). PRAGMATIC AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF NEOLOGISMS IN CONTEMPORARY MEDIA AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR VOCABULARY TEACHING. Journal of Universal Science Research, 3(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14674390 https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/jusr/article/view/9454

9. Mamadiyorova , M. ., & Bakhtiyorova , M. . (2025). PRAGMATIC AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF NEOLOGISMS IN MODERN ENGLISH (BASED ON MEDIA MATERIALS) AND THEIR ROLE IN TEACHING VOCABULARY. Центральноазиатский журнал междисциплинарных исследований и исследований в области управления, 2(1), 187–191. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/cajmrms/article/view/43009

10. Mamadiyorova , M. ., & Bakhtiyorova , M. . (2025). PRAGMATIC AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF NEOLOGISMS IN MODERN ENGLISH (BASED ON MEDIA MATERIALS) AND THEIR ROLE IN TEACHING VOCABULARY. (2025). Journal of Science-Innovative Research in Uzbekistan, 3(1),217-221. https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/jsiru/article/view/9503

11. Sadullaeva, N., & Bakhtiyorova, M. (2021). Reflection of Onomastic Principles in Naming. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 3001- 3007.

12. Бахтиёрова, М. (2024). Atoqli otlarning umumnazariy muammolari. Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика, 2(6), 40-45.

13. Ismoilov, A., & Bakhtiyorova, M. (2024). THE PROBLEM OF COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEANING IN PRESENT DAY LEXICOLOGY. Current approaches and new research in modern sciences, 3(7), 26-29.

14. Alisher o'g'li, I. A., & Bakhtiyorovna, B. M. (2024, May). THE PROBLEM OF COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEANING IN PRESENT DAY LEXICOLOGY. In Konferensiyalar| Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 10, pp. 748-752).

15. BAXTIYOROVA, M. (2024). ONOMASTIK KONSEPT TUSHUNCHASI. UzMU xabarlari, 1(1.4), 288-292. 14. Камолова, Р. Ш., & Бахтиярова, М. (2024). ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ КОННОТАЦИИ ПРИЛАГАТЕЛЬНЫХ, ОПИСЫВАЮЩИХ ПОГОДУ. TA'LIM VA RIVOJLANISH TAHLILI ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 4(1), 30-33.

16. Baxtiyorova, M. (2023). ONOMASTIKONLARNING LINGVOMADANIY XUSUSIYATLARI. Namangan davlat universiteti Ilmiy axborotnomasi, (9), 464-469.

17. Baxtiyorovna, B. M. (2023). INGLIZ VA O ‘ZBEK BADIIY ADABIYOTIDA ONOMASTIKONLARNING CHOG‘ISHTIRMA SEMANTIK TAHLILI. " GERMANY" MODERN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: ACHIEVEMENTS, INNOVATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS, 9(1).

18. Baxtiyorova, M. (2023). INGLIZ VA O ‘ZBEK BADIIY ADABIYOTIDA ASAR QAHRAMONLARI NOMLARINING MATN “JOURNAL OF SCIENCE-INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN UZBEKISTAN” JURNALI VOLUME 3, ISSUE 01, 2025. YANUARY ResearchBib Impact Factor: 9.654/2024 ISSN 2992-8869 221 YARATISHDAGI ISHTIROKI. Namangan davlat universiteti Ilmiy axborotnomasi, (10), 268-273.

19. Bakhtiyorovna, B. M. (2022). Discursive-pragmatic nature of anthroponyms. Asian Journal Of Multidimensional Research, 11(9), 110-114.

20. Bakhtiyarova, M. B. (2021). VERBALIZATION OF THE CONCEPT" ONIM" IN LINGUOCOGNITOLOGY. Ростовский научный вестник, (3), 11- 12. 20. Baxtiyorova, M. B. (2020). ANTROPONIMLARNING SHAKLLANISHIDA MORFEMALARNING SEMANTIK VA USLUBIY XUSUSIYATLARI. Студенческий вестник, (36-3), 96-98.

21. Bakhtiyorova, M. (2019). THE EFFECT OF USING MNEMONICS. Студенческий вестник, (22-8), 63-65. 22. Pulatova, S., & Bakhtiyorova, M. (2019). THE STRUCTURALSEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF THE WORDS RELATED TO" SPORTS" IN PRESENT DAY ENGLISH. Студенческий вестник, (22-8), 69-71.

22. Bakhtiyorova, M., & Djumabayeva, J. (2017). WRITERS MAKE NATIONAL LITERATURE, WHILE TRANSLATORS MAKE UNIVERSAL LITERATURE. Студенческий вестник, (10), 55-56.

23. Bakhtiyorova, M., & Elmurodova, F. (2017). THE PRINCIPLES OF SEMANTICS. Студенческий вестник, (10), 52-54.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.