Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This article deals with the semantics of phraseological units consisting mainly of antroponyms. It is known that antroponyms form the largest lexical-semantic group of onomastic units. Therefore, in this article, proper nouns have been analyzed in the English and Uzbek language from a linguacultural point of view using several examples.
References
Maslova V. A. Linguoculturology. Moscow Publishing Center “Academy”, 2001. P 30-32
Телия В.Н. Русская фразеология: семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. –М:. Школа “Язык русской културы”, 1996.- С. 288.
Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. 2-издание. –М.: Академия, 2004. – С.6
Korzyukova Z.V. The main aspects of the functioning of phraseological units with proper names in the English language: national and cultural specificity. Diss. for Cand. Of Philol. sciences. – Moscow, 2003. P. 486.
Rakhmatullaev Sh. Explanatory dictionary of Uzbek language. Tashkent, 1978. P. 406.
Mamatov A.E. Issues of the formation of the phrazeologisms of the Uzbek language. Abstract for Doc. of Philol. sciences. – Tashkent, 1999. P. 316.
Hakimova G.E. Structural semantic features of phonological units with Zooonimic component. Abstract of the work for Cand. of Philol. sciences Tashkent, 2008. P. 24
Azizova F.S. (2018). Lingua-cultural features of teaching phraseological units in the Uzbek language to the students of higher education establishments (under the examples of English and Uzbek languages): The dissertation thesis (PhD). - Tashkent, -p. 56.
D.M.Gulland, D.G.Hinds-Howell. The Penguin Dictionary of English Idioms. Harmondworth, England, 1986. P-195
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.