Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The article provides a comparative analysis of outcomes between early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Pathophysiological aspects of the gallbladder inflammatory process determining surgical strategy across different time windows from symptom onset are reviewed. Key clinical outcomes, including conversion rates to open surgery, total length of hospital stay, postoperative complication rates (including bile duct injury), and cost-effectiveness, are analyzed. Based on modern international guidelines (Tokyo Guidelines 2018), the advantages of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the gold standard of treatment are substantiated.
References
1. Mayumi T., Okamoto K., Takada T. et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholecystitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2018;25(1):96-100.
2. Gutt C. N., Encke J., Köninger J. et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC trial). Annals of Surgery. 2013;258(3):385-393.
3. Roulin D., Saadi A., Di Mare L. et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery. 2016;264(5):717-722.
4. Ревишвили А. Ш., Федоров А. В., Сажин В. П. и др. Острый холецистит: клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2021;(12):5-15. (In Russ.)
5. Pisano M., Allievi N., Gurusamy K. et al. 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2020;15(1):61
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
